Monday 14 March 2016

Mest 1 Section B: Independent Case Study

Spectre Case Study


The Basics:

1) Details about the film-

Name= James Bond Spectre 

Director= Sam Mendes 

Stars (notable)= 
  • Daniel Craig
  • Christopher Waltz
  • Ralph Fiennes 
  • Monica Bellucci 
  • Naomi Harris 
Type of film= Franchise (The James Bond Series)

Location= England

2) When was it released-

Release of film= 26 October 2016

3) Genre of film and generic conventions-

Genre= Action, Adventure and Thriller

Generic conventions= 
  • Use of weaponry
  • Agent style film
  • Location is at MI5 (special ops team)
  • Explosions visible from trailer
  • Tone is dark and gritty 
  • Use of location destruction
  • Fight sequences present during the trailer
4) Critical Reception-

Rating on IMDB= 6.9/10
Rating on Rotten Tomatoes= 64% 

Broadcast:

1) MIGRAIN analysis of film:

Media language

Costumes- Suits, dresses, military, Halloween part theme
Lighting- High-key lighting and low key lighting (in some scenes)
Actors expressions- serious tone
Make up- Female make-up present as well as the lighter tone of skin colour on some of the characters.
Props- guns, costumes (suits), vehicle, boat, plane a ring and gadgets
Setting-London, icy climate, luxurious house/building, ancient landmarks

Institution

Spectre had a budget of $245,000,000 which is known as a big budget film. The money used to fund this from came largely from, Sony Pictures who gave the majority of its money towards the films project. In Hollywood, this budget is roughly a normal and healthy budget for any film that is made in Hollywood. There were many different types of institutions involved in the making of this film that are well known for example, Columbia Pictures who helped to distribute the film. Columbia Pictures were involved in the film appeal to larger audiences such as, portrayal through poster, advertisements or even social media management. 

Genre

The genre of the film is solely based off of an action genre. This is evident through out the trailer even. The first few seconds into the trailer is about 007 targeting a man in a building, soon after blowing it up. These are clear connotations towards an action related genre. Moreover, there are various types of props that correlate to the genre as the main prop used is a gun. The tone of the trailer and of the franchise is built up of a revenge plot-line which often works best with an action and thriller type film as lots of physical violence is present during this and the other James Bong films.

Representation

The film seems to represent white middle/upper class people as posh and of high education. This is apparent in the trailer where the majority of the characters seen in this trailer are wearing suits. These are connotations and props that all work together to create this representation of well educated people. Moreover, the accent in which most of the characters (in this trailer speak) is very fluent and posh- typical/stereotypical English/British voice. It shows how powerful the British is through the way they speak and even shows how well educated they are as they speak fluently and with tone.

Another representation is the use of males doing the majority of action sequences. We see the main protagonist (who is male) and has co-workers whom are also male. This is present in the trailer where we see 007's boss (who is a male) and also other workers in the background of MI5. This representation that is present in the trailer (and in the past James Bond films) shows how presents British society to be male dominant and still carries stereotypes of male dominance even in the trailer. However, there are some characters who do counter this argument such as the character, MoneyPenny. This is a black female actor playing the role of the assistant of the protagonist. This role does counter the representations that previous films had, however it does still contain strong representations that are still present in today's society.

Ideologies

People who view this trailer will automatically perceive England as a powerful country. This is present in the character of 007 and the actions/things he does in this trailer. It seems to show the power of the country through the protagonist and to create a virtual image of Britain. The message that audiences would see would be 'Britain has many more agents like this...'. The message is trying to make people ideological thinking change by creating a virtual version in their mind.

Another ideology present in this trailer is that Britain if full of rich assets as well as rich/upper class people. This is apparent where most of the scenes take place in mansions or in high end apartments as well as people wearing luxurious clothing. These conventions are all used to portray this picture of a 'rich Britain' as all characters seen in this trailer are wearing expensive looking clothes as well as owning expensive assets. This shows audiences how rich Britain is as well as, how historical it can be as famous landmarks too are shown in this trailer to show the historical theme and context in the film.

Narrative

The narrative that audiences can pick up from the trailer is, a young male MI5 agent comes across an important piece of data that triggers a mission he must proceed with. It is a man of his past that is the villain and he doesn't know what is in store for him once he embarks on this journey.
Often, trailers use a variety of shots from the chronology placement of the entire film, but place little segments in the trailer to make the story flow and come across to the audience.

2)

Different types of promotion for the film- Spectre:


The marketing team behind this idea had made a great move in order to help promote the film. This is because they are suing the most common ways of grabbing peoples attentions- by using cars. Cars that look really good or are just well known such as, Lamborghini get many peoples attention even when they are busy doing something else. This strategy works really well to help make people go and see the movie. They used the actual Aston Martin which was featured in the James Bong film- Spectre and was driving the vehicle through the streets of London to gain peoples attention. Cars make people look at them by revving the engine of the car, so that pedestrians will turn their attention to the thing that is making the sound. In addition, the whole idea of having the Aston Martin there is to promote the film, and is representing the film in this way. People who haven't heard of the film who see this car will now know of its existence as they have seen the car promote it in London,


This is a TV spot for the film. A TV spot is essentially a small preview of the film in 30 seconds and is often played on TV. What's so significant about a TV spot? Well a TV spot would normally contain some of the best action sequences as well as a brief synopsis breakdown in 30 seconds to keep audience entertained as well as want to watch the film, but also it is there to build hype. A TV spot is very different from a teaser trailer as a TV spot will contain mostly the footage seen in the previous trailers, they have just been selected and placed into a sequence to make a different TV spot. TV spots show up on YouTube and social media closer to the release of the film. Furthermore, those who follow and are major fans of the 007 franchise would want to watch a TV spot as sometime the film makers may throw in a new scene that people haven't even seen yet (as in, it hasn't been seen on any trailer or material related to the film).
A great example is Batman V Superman, there is a TV spot where Batman is seen to say the line 'Well, here I am...' which is a scene that was placed into the TV spot rather than the actual trailers for the film. This could be for the people who don't want to learn too much about the film and would rather watch a small brief trailer about the film so that they do not learn everything about the film.

This TV spot was used to promote the film Spectre as TV spots (like the one above) usually come out closer to the films release date. The film distributors would create multiple versions of a TV spot, each containing different scenes etc. The more they release, the more publicity it will have via YouTube (which is where the majority of TV spots get released) as it will fill the YouTube 'latest' section ensuring users should check it out. Moreover, the TV spots (at times) can be considered better than the theatrical trailer. This is because it doesn't give too much away (which some trailer do now days) and builds 'hype' for the movie as some of the greatest scenes are used in the TV spot.

3)

Use of having stars to promote the film?:

One famous celebrity/singer known as Sam Smith has made a song dedicated to the release of this film. The song is entirely based on the film and is now the films theme song known as 'Writing on the walls'. This acts as a form of synergy between he music and film industry by using different artists to promote each other. Sam Smith is a well known singer and has a large fan-base, fans who see his music video would want to go watch the film as he is seen to promote the film through his song (as it is dedicated to the film). Not only is the song based on the film Spectre, the music video contains large amount of footage from the actual film. This is makes the focus of the video all around Spectre the movie as users who see the footage are listening to the music but as watching the film. This makes users want to watch the film as they learn abut the film without knowing, as they are listening to their favourite music artist.

Print:

1) The last THREE reviews-
Source: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2379713/reviews?ref_=tt_ov_rt
  • "A truly unexciting 'action' movie" 
  • "Tedious and overblown"
  • "A fairly muddled entry into the Bond canon"

2) Examples of print promotion-


This is an advertising poster for the film Spectre. This is a normal poster as it shows off the protagonist (played by Daniel Craig) as well as the logo for the film and the brand of 007. This poster helps t promote the film as it is large in size meaning, that wherever this poster is decided to be placed, it will get the attention of the majority of people who walk by it due to its appealing look. Moreover, it shows off 007 which will familiarise its audience after they see this poster which may make them want to watch it.



This is another example of promotion for the film. The image above is of a bus that is fully dedicated and painted for the film. Here we can see, the entire bus filled with promotion text as well as images that are linked with the film. Because this film is set in London and is from a classic British TV series, Britain wants to do everything they can to promote the film as the film represents the country. Majority of the films that come out in cinemas are big name Hollywood productions and the film Spectre is a film that is entirely based around Britain and publicises British power. This bus is an example of how proud Britain are to have a film that represents it. And by placing images and changing bus colours will really grab the attention of the public as they probably haven't seen anything like it.

3) Example of a print and analysis of it-



  • Actor- Audience get to see the new look of the character known as 'James Bond' as the actor 'Daniel Craig' is largely associated with James Bond now day and whenever people see the actors face, they would instantly refer to a link with James Bond. Therefore, it was imperative for them to include the visual reference of what the protagonist will be looking like in this new movie. 
  • In most Bond films there will always have a Bond girl which by the looks of it, this poster does include. We see the new Bond girl, who is positioned in a typical way for a female to be presented on a film advert as the promotion would be largely male dominated due to the gender of the main protagonist. 
  • There is also a glimpse of the antagonist (the villain) of the film behind both characters. This poster seems to take inspiration for Star Wars theme concept art where there is the villain usually portrayed above and in the distance of the main characters to give the poster that equality in terms of heroes and villains. In addition, one key thing in this promotion is that the villain is masked, building that suspense to the audience as those are eager to find out who he/she is.
  • Finally, we see the new title of the film and what it is going to be called. This is important as most James Bond films, will have the title of the film in a new font which acts as a form of differentiation from the other James Bond films. It gives off the uniqueness of this film through its style as well as new font for the 'Spectre' title.

4) Film's brand construction-

The main brand that is present is the number '007' and is a very powerful and significant brand for this film. The number defines the film because, whenever someone says that number, people would refer to James Bond as that number represents the film as well as the character. In the majority of films that are parodies or even spy films them self, they would reference James Bond (sometimes) by referring to the code name; 007.

Another brand image that this film has is the title of the film. Each Bond film is differentiated due to the title of the film. The title of the film is what makes the film unique from its other counter parts and in this case it is the title- Spectre. Often (so far) we have seen each title of the Bond film, everything from Casino Royale to Spectre have their own and unique font to represent the film. People can notice a film through its font such as, if a film was a stand alone film however took place in the same universe, the title of that film will convey this. An example is Star Wars, there is a stand alone Star Wars movie coming out in late December 2016 called Rogue One. This film doesn't have the name 'Star Wars' in front of the films name, it is just Rogue One. The name Rogue One is surrounded by another text saying 'A Star Wars story' in the same font that every other Star Wars film has. Therefore, it is the font that creates the brand image as people will see that the font is only specific to that film only and if they see it anywhere else, they would recall the film of where that font actual came from.

E- Media:

1) Films presence on social media-

Facebook

The Spectre Facebook is still active even though it is 6 months past the release of the film. They tend to post screengrabs from the official film to still keep the fans interactive about the film and not forgetting it. There have been a fair amount of likes on both the page itself as well as on each post they do. They have over 1,000,000 likes for the page and usually get under 5,000 likes per post. The like count shows how they are still promoting the film as it shows the number of people who are interested in the film still after its release..

In addition, the screengrab above show one of many ways the film page has tried to promote the film. The post shown above shows the awards that the film has currently received and this form of post acts as a big way to persuade people to watch the film. Those who have liked the page (which is under 1 million) will likely see this post and therefore, may want to see it due to its success for receiving a highly reputable and well known award. The post acts as a way to remind people of how popular and great the film is and that if it receives an award like this, there is no reason why people shouldn't go and see it; this is the message that the post is trying to give out.

Twitter


This is an example of promotion for the film on the films Twitter age. Although the screengrab above isn't of the actual page posting the tweet, but the ability to re-tweet the tweet makes it seem like a form of promotion as the film wants its twitter fans to see this post as well as those who haven't seen the movie. By the films twitter page re-tweeting this post, it is as if they are trying to promote the film using other and actual fans words to do that. This is because if someone sees this post, they are more likely to watch the film after seeing a 'fan' or another person share their opinion for it. Furthermore, by re-tweeting the post, they are trying to get the message to a even wider audience so that their fan base can see the post as well as other Twitter users who haven't yet seen the movie.

Instagram


Here is an instagram post from the James Bond instagram page. This is another form of promotion for the film. In this post, the film is trying to make fans interact with them with a chance of winning the prize. The prize is to go and see the official Aston Martin from the actual film Spectre. This is a form of promotion as it has been 6 months since the film has been released and people will stop 'hyping' and getting excited for it and therefore forgetting about it. However, this post is used to gain those audiences back and make them still remember the film by giving them the chance to win a prize. By posting this, they are making their fans and users interact with them and acts a a way of promoting the film.

2) Analysis of official website-

Source: http://www.007.com/spectre/

The films website is very neat and portrays itself well. This means that it presents itself to the audience of being a big-budget and famous known film. Like most film websites, the protagonist is clearly seen on the first page which is typical for film websites. In addition to this, the banner is updated to the new title of the film known as 'Spectre' and this too is typical of many other film websites. The website seems to draw attention more to the characters of the film more than the production. There is a synopsis of the movie which instantly acts as a way to draw the viewers attention into making the decision if they like or dislike the film.

The theme of the film runs through each link. The website contains mini games to do with spies as well as making the film seem real through the link, Q's workshop which is a way for uses to interact with the films site and content.

There are many forms of synergy seen on the website for Spectre. One of which is the cross promotion of the Aston Martin vehicle which was used for the film. The webpage dedicates an entire page of all the vehicles used to make the movie and this acts as a form of synergy as it is promoting the car as well as the car promoting the film. When people see the exact car, they will refer to the film as it was first sighted there. Furthermore, there is a cross promotion with the music industry as there is a dedicate song for promoting the film. The song as made by Sam Smith who made a song promoting the film. Those who are fans of the film and hear its main theme (done by Sam), then the film is promoting the singer in a way.

3) Any type of e-media based campaign-

There was no form of e-media campaign that was major big compared to the Ill Manors tag London campaign. There was one which I have noticed on Twitter, where the page posted a tweet telling users to wear a suit for the opening weekend of the films release. However, this campaign didn't go as viral as compared to other campaigns which could be the reason for people not knowing of its presence.

4) Examples of the two-step theory online-

There have been posts largely on Twitter where famous celebrates have posted their love for the film Spectre and how the actor had done a fantastic job again. Those who follow these fans but are not aware of this film, once they see this post they are more likely to listen to them and therefore believe that the film is good without even watching it. Another example is on IMDB where there are many famous and reputable critic which most of the public rely on before watching the film- to know if the film is worth it. This is another example of the two step flow model as people will ultimately take in the opinion and judgement of another person and will take it into consideration without even making up their own mind. Reviews and critics for a film come from the opinion of the critic and the review is based off of their experience for the film. However, those who really consider these people's opinion would be influenced through opinion leaders rather than the media itself.


Audience:

1) Target audience for the film-

The film has a 12A certificate which has been judged by the BBFC. This doesn't necessarily mean that the film makers intended their film to reach that audience, it is just what category (or the amount of points) the film has received according to their criteria. If the intended audience was to be 12 and over then, they would be from a middle and higher class background due to the style and theme of the film being about a rich white male who does dangerous things for his country. The film seems to follow a more mainstream story which best targets this class range. In addition, the film would be 50/50 gender split as these films don't always focus around the male character. This franchise is well known for having a Bond girl rather just having a male Bond character. People want to (or feel eager) to know who the new Bond girl is as they tend to change through out each film. As a result, due to this anticipation for a Bond as well as a female Bond, there is likely going to be an equal audience for both genders.

Pyschographics, would generally be aspirer and mainstreamer as they all want a source of escapism from their daily lives. The film involve violence and dangerous missions which is what people don't often see in their daily lives, therefore the film is for escapism purposes. In addition, the story of a man seeking revenge for the death of his family is a very similar story line in films and therefore, it is for a mainstream audience as it is similar to other content.

2) How does synergy target the audience-

There are two examples of cross media platforms linked with this film that target this audience, one of them being the music element of this film. Every Bond film will tend to be sung by a different singer and would have an entirely different tune than the one before and after it. Before Spectre, it was Skyfall and its main theme song was sung by Adele. There is a cross promotion for this film due to the fanbase of the singer. The singer who sung the main theme for Spectre is called Sam Smith. This is a British singer who has a wide fanbase. Now considering, this is a new and well known singer, by using him to sing a song for the main theme for Britain's most famous film would join many fans and consumers. Fans of Sam's content (even international ones) would go and see the film as he has participated in creating and singing the main theme song. Furthermore, those who are fans of the Bond franchise would probably want to hear more of the singer who sung the main theme for Spectre. Therefore, the idea of the main theme song attract audiences from both sides.

3) Possible audience pleasures-

One main pleasure that audiences would have is the historic element to Britain. Stereotypically, Britain is seen to be a country who is built up of ancient and historical laws and aesthetics as there are so many famous landmarks taking people back 100's of years such as, the Big Ben. In addition. audience want to see more difference in the tone and theme of British films. People are so used to viewing American films and they would like to explore into other nationalities of film types such as this.

Furthermore, considering that the majority of films are from America, people don't actually see films based around Britain unless it is filmed in Britain etc. Often, British films tend to show knowledge about the monarch and audiences from America may fee fascinated by this as they haven't experienced a monarch before and this can be portrayed through a film such as this.

4) Similar films for audience-

  • Kingsman the secret service
  • Johnny English
  • Bridge of spies
  • Taken
Institution:

1) Details about the film studio:

Production company- 
  • Columbia pictures
What other films have they produced-
  • The Amazing Spiderman
  • Robocop
  • Men In Black 3
  • Terminator
  • Surfs up
Track record with the type of film and audience-

Columbia Pictures have a variety of films that they create and is a multi film company that doesn't focus around a central theme or idea. They do tend to base their films under the 12A certificate and do a lot of family related movies. Most of their movies are either PG or under the 12A category. Moreover, they do not just focus on this type of film. They have a wide range of genres that their movies appeal to.

2) Distribution company:
  • Sony Pictures Entertainment 
Other films they produced-
  • Elysiam
  • Paul Blart: Mall Cop
  • Hancock
  • Spiderman 2 
3) Track record in terms of audience and type of film:

Sony seems to do the same type of films as Columbia Pictures do as Columbia Pictures is part of the Sony branch and therefore, is likely to produce or distribute films from similar category. Sony often has their films rated below the 12A mark as well as focus of a variety of films, not just one. 

4) Budget for the film:

Budget- $245,000,000

5) Financial success of film:

Grossed- £200,000,000 in USA alone
Opening weekend- $70,500,000
USA- $200,000,000
UK- £623,433,808.69
International- 679,500,000

6) Success nationally or internationality:

The data shows that the film did better nationally in England than compared to other countries such as America which is where most of the viewers are from (for other movies). England has made 400,000,000 more than compared to America. However internationally, the film still beat England's box office hit record. The film managed to gain nearly 700,000,000 at the box office. Films now days are not always dominated nationally. This is because it is considered mainstream in one country, but can attract a whole segment of viewers in another. And the type of film can actually attract a larger group of people due to its content being different.

7) Certificate for the film and reason:

The film Spectre was given a 12A and I do agree with this decision to an extent. This is because the film contained a lot of violence and action scene which is the primary reason for the 12A certificate and cannot be viewed by a younger audience. However, I do disagree with this as Bond films do tend to have sexual activity within them and according to the points for a 15 certificate, sexual encounters would be closer to a 15 certificate. Furthermore, the film doesn't structure its entire film around this,
it is mostly filled with action and violence which is probably why it isn't with the 15 certificate as there is not much sexual or even strong language present during the film. This is why the film is a 12A certificate, as it focuses on the action sequences which is what makes a Bond film great in the public's eyes.


Representation:

1) Representation of people, groups and location seen in the film:

The most common representation is of the British male. The character James Bond is seen to represent the country, portraying it to the world that Britain has men like this; men who take risks and care for society.
Another representation is Britain being portrayed as a white dominant country. There are a few non-white characters in this film and is largely dominated by white ethnic people. This represents Britain being more of its historical ethnicity.
Furthermore, the white characters are seen to be fairly upper class. Even in the scene where James is in public, we see a lot of white people smarty dressed showing their class.
Finally, the foreigners are seen as the villains. We see that the villain (or part villain) is a foreigner and is not from Britain. This shows that the film carries those ideologies of non-Britons being a threat.

2) Aspect of Britishness within the film (extent):

The location of the film is the biggest aspect of Britishness and it is the location than theme that makes this film stand out. Most films that are released are from America and are often set in America, however one of the biggest soy films is British and it is the location and type of character that makes British people want to watch it. It makes Britons proud that they have a successful film franchise like James Bond.

The British people is another aspect of Britishness that is represented through the film. The film seems to be conveying to the world that Britain has people like this, like James Bond who are dedicated towards their country. Its as if the film is portraying the typical British person through their most well known film character.

3) Representation of Britain compared to Ill Manors:

Both films portray Britain is a different way. The slogan of Ill Manors even states their portrayal of Britain. First of all, Ill Manors, basing it off of them, tone and style of the film the audience can see a negative view point of Britain. There is very little colour and if there was, it would be dull and grey colours. In addition to this, the people are portrayed very differently. In James Bond the characters are presented as strong and loyal to their peers whereas Ill Manors have their character speaking slang and dressed like criminals.

In addition, Ill Manors was created on political ground and had a political aspect to it whereas Spectre didn't. The main purpose for creating Spectre was to carry on the franchise of the well known James Bond franchise as well as to continue and entertain the public. Ill Manors director Ben Drew even stated that his film is to create a message to the government and to the people around the world. He dislikes the changes made to the country and its affect on young people. He wanted to make a film that would show how the youth are suffering from this change and how the government are doing wrong.

4) Values and ideologies seen in the film:

The most well known  ideology seen in the film is that Britain is proud of its historical state. There are many scene through out the film which take place in famous landmarks around Britain. The film makers are trying to make the audience realise this by setting certain scenes in historical places known to Britain.

Another value and ideology is that Britain can make as good films as America.This film is to counter the American films and show how Britain can still create fine films such as this. The film is seen to represent the country. Furthermore, another film that represents Britain in an equal state is Harry Potter. The film is set around London and is themed around the country. This franchise represents Britain as holding the most amazing franchises as well as authors.

Case study comparison:


Similarities-

Ill Manors and Spectre both take place in the same country/location- Britain. Even though they are both created and set around these locations, it doesn't mean that their portrayals of these locations is going to be the same. Both Ill Manors and Spectre are themed and are known to be set around Britain/London. Their characters are also there to reflect their environments. This is clearly evident as both characters from both films seem to be different due to the different take/portrayal of their environment.

Both films consider and relate to justice in a way. Ill Manors is about, how young teenagers need to watch themselves from the police as they may be seen doing criminal related things. The idea of justice is also the main motive for the director Ben Drew to make the film Ill Manors. This is because he wants to create justice for the youth and how they are being ill treated by society, and by him creating this film he is trying to create a message to society to change their view of the youth. Spectre on the other hand, is about a man who is trying to bring the bad guys to justice due to them harming James and his country.

Differences-

Ill Manors is more accurately based on truth and true event that have occurred whereas Spectre is mostly made up and is not based around reality. Ill Manors isn't a films for just entertainment purposes. It is also their to inform and educate the consumer/viewer of the content. Ben Drew wanted the viewers to understand the problems that the youth face due to the changes made by the government. Spectre on the other hand, is primarily there to entertain audiences and those who are fans of this franchise. Spectre has generated this big fan base that goes back to 70 years worth of James Bond related content. The current James Bond films link with one another and therefore, it is needed for another movie to come about to finish off the story line or perhaps continue a new one.


Thursday 10 March 2016

Section B: Institution Research

Institution Research

Ill Manors- Funding and production budget:

Source: IMDB ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1760967/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1 )

1) Estimated budget:

£100,000

2) Where did the money come from?:
  • Microwave film
  • Film London
  • BBC Films
  • Revolver entertainment 
3) Budget comparison to Hollywood:

Comparing the two industries (the British industry and Hollywood industry), Ill Manors is considered to be of a very high budget for a British film whereas it is considered a very micro budget film as it is a fraction of what a traditional Hollywood film goes for (the go for about 100 million dollars).

Skyfall, although it is considered a British film (due to the characters origins coming from a classic drama back in the 1900's), there is a lot of American related things in it. The film was created and funded by an American big name film distributor known as, Sony Pictures. This company (and many more) were involved in funding this film so that it can market and portray itself well to the public. All this money included in the films budget (which was $200,000,000) would go towards production and marketing costs as well as other things. However, Ben Drew had to spend his money carefully as he was limited in the things he could do to make his film a success.

A Field In England: Funding and production budget:

Source: IMDB ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2375574/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1 )

1) Estimated budget:

£316,000

2) Why did this film get a higher budget than Ill Manors?:

I think that the reputation of the director made the investing companies for likely to give their funding towards A Field in England than compared to Ben Drew. The reason why Ben Drew's film, Ill Manors, received a smaller budget to make the film was because it was a risky option for the investing companies. Ben was a first time director when he handled this product and therefore, there wasn't much of a show reel for him to give to other big name investors for them to see what his directing and film making is like. A show reel is a bunch of videos that the artist has worked on so that he/she can show companies their work, this allows the companies to see the type of art and work you produce. Ben Drew only made a few short videos and this resulted in him getting low amount of funding. Whereas, Ben Wheatley is a reputable and famous director and it is this fame that has given him recognition of his work, making big name film distributors want to fund his film project.

3) Where did the money come from?:
  • Film 4
  • Rook films

Film London and Microwave Film:

Source: Film London and Microwave website

Film London- http://filmlondon.org.uk/
Microwave Film- http://filmlondon.org.uk/feature-film-funding/

1) What is Film London:

Film London is a non-profit agency which is largely supported by the government. They also receive project grants from a number of different organisations to aid them when needed. Film London is supported by the following:

  • Mayor of London
  • BFI
  • Arts Council England

2) Purpose of Microwave film:

Microwave don't only fund feature films but also provide mentoring and development to all the short-listed projects as well as, production finance and distribution support. There will be 12 teams selected and these teams will gain support and training at Film London's Microschool along with development funding.

3) Ill Manors comparison with a Microwave film product:

The film known as 'Shifty' is a film that has a similar concept to Ill Manors as they both follow similar character themes across the two films. Moreover, they both share the same actor who is playing the main protagonist in the film- Riz Ahemd.
Similarities:

  • Use of the same actor 
  • The role of the same actor is virtually the same (main character)
  • drug relations
  • Police are involved
  • Going against society 
  • Friend relationships
Differences:
  • The target market (this film seems to target a much older audience than compared to Ill Manors) there are rarely no youth references or portrayals. 
  • Duo role- two best friends are the prime focus through out the narrative
  • Different narrative structure. Ill Manors followed a muti-stand narrative. 

Vertigo Films and Warp Films:

1) The most successful vertigo films:

  • Sweeny
  • Football Factory
  • Monsters (1 and 2)
  • Street dance


2) Why successful with audience:

One reason why these films were successful with their audience was because each film targeted a different audience segment. This works really well as Vertigo can get hold of many types of audiences through the variety of films genres they produce. Football Factory is a clear example, this film focuses on the football element and it grabs the attention of a niche audience who are more interested in football films than any other. vertigo have clearly made films that attracts niche audiences and try to get them content that they will absolutely enjoy.

3) Different film genres:
  • Family
  • Action
  • Sport
  • Sci-fi
  • Animated/animation
  • Thriller
  • Comedy
  • Children related content
4) Where did warp films start out:

Warp films first started out as Warp Records (the first version of itself) It was created by NESTA who also gave financial support, and had the remit to produce short films. It had set-up head quarters in Sheffield and in London. Over the years, there have been a new division of Warp films known as Warp X and War Films Australia. These show how the business of Warp has expanded excessivly over the last 10 years of its introduction.

5) Most successful films produced:
  • '71
  • The Last Panthers
  • This is England

6) Development of new talent:

They have been working in the British film industry for 10 years and continues to be so. They have come across many types of talents during those 10 years. They plan to create more visionary content for upcoming Directors as well as writers etc.

7) Film productions (which Vertigo and Warp films) have worked on that is similar to Ill Manors:

Warp: '71
Vertigo: Football Factory

These are two different films however, are quite similar to Ill Manors itself. One similarity is the need to target a specific audience. Ill Manors, wants to focus on the youth and by doing this, they are attracting young age audience. The Football Factory does the same. They focus of young men playing football and shows off the violence that can occur in such as game. It is trying to attract football lovers and those who love to learn more about the sport. Finally, '71 is a film that focuses on historical context of Ireland. The film is set round a young man who works for the Derbyshire army.Due to the fact that this film focuses on a young man as well as having a historical element to it, attracts a large audience similar to Ill Manors. Ill Manors, follows a muti-stand narrative each character having different issues than the other. These issues are used to promote the film as people who actually understand this are likely to watch the film as there is a connection development.

Certification- BBFC

1) How are films rated in the BBFC:

Examiners would normally view the content whether that is a movie/film or a DVD. The examiner normally would view a DVD on their own- this is known as 'solo viewing'. Content that are eligible for solo viewing would often be TV series as well as work aimed at young children. Works that seem to hold controversial opinions would be viewed to more than one individual so that the outcome is diverse opinions. With each content they view, examiners look out for the following when deciding:

2) Differences between an 18 certificate and a 15 certificate:

These are what a 15 certificate should have to be classified as a 15 age rating-




  • General context of the content- plot point (storyline) 
  • Bad language, sexual or drug related references
  • Timings of key moments- type of camera shots used


  • I disagree with the certification for Ill Manors. The film may have drug and sexual references but I don't think it is crossing the boundaries of a 15 certificate. An example of a film that has been given a 15 certificate is Deadpool (2016). This film came out in February and has been critically acclaimed to be the best R rated film of all time. I, myself have gone out to watch this film, however I though that this film would be an 18 certificate due to the level of sexual activity as well as swearing seen in the trailer. The level of strong language as well as sexual scenes in Deadpool has crossed the 15 certificate by a mile. Ill Manors does not have the same level of sexual content as well as strong language than compared to Deadpool. Moreover, Deadpool contained more strong violence and graphic scenes which clearly, Ill Manors didn't have. Deadpool is the type of movie that these references are known t the character which is why it is so famous. However, I do think that the BBFC were a bit too lenient towards giving Deadpool a 15 certificate even though the film contains more strong content than Ill Manors.

    3) How might the 18 certificate affected the Ill Manors target audience:

    Due to the BBFC classification for the Ill Manors film being 18, would have split their target audience down in half. Before the film is made, the producers and director would plan what age rating should the film come under so that they can film according to the plans they have discussed. Sometimes during filming, tweaks and changes would be made to the script as well as the narrative to fit new scenes into the film. Thus resulting, in scenes that are pushing the boundaries of a 15 certificate. The theme and style of Ill Manors made it clear that they were planning to make the film for a 15 age demographic, however some scenes as well as references have been added to the film that would have made BBFC class this as a 18 rather than a 15. Due to this, the core audience that the film makers plan to show their film to, would be marginalised as the certification has prevented anyone under the age of 18 to watch the film, which would leave the film making less revenue as they are not getting enough money from the other segment of their core target audience.

    4) Certificate for A Field In England and why was this awarded:

    Certificate: 15

    A Field In England was rated as a 15 certificate. This is because for a 15 certificate, the content must have references to drugs or sexual activity. This film does have references to drugs as drugs play a core part in the films narrative. It is about, four soldiers who go in to a field and consume magic mushrooms (which is a drug) and turns their experience (during the war) upside down. This film does reference drugs but doesn't reference other parts that classify a film to be a 15 certificate such as sexual references.

    5) Advantages and disadvantages of a film being awarded a 18 certificate:

    Advantages-

    • Can prevent any younger age kids from knowing of adult contents (restricts them)
    • Can make the film gain more recognition as people would fear to watch the film

    Disadvantages-

    • Can separate the films core target audience (won't gain enough revenue)
    • Can put off people from watching the film (they will think its too strong in terms of content)

    Thursday 3 March 2016

    A Field In England: the appeal of arthouse film


    The Appeal of Arthouse Film


    1) Suggested audience pleasures:

    One of the most common things that society/the public want to see in an Artouse film is a change in the narrative. This is because Hollywood productions tend to resolve the narrative at the end of the film. All films created by them follow a similar structure of resolving the equilibrium. Those who watch these films (which can be the entire world) would expect to see some form of resolution towards the end of their film as they are so used to seeing them. However, Arthouse films challenges this 'common' way of structuring and telling the narrative. As a result, those who watch the Arthouse films are going to be more entertained as the outcome of the narrative will be completely different to what they usually see on screen.

    Moreover, another form of pleasure that audience gets from Arthouse films is the use of difficult narrative. This is because people enjoy seeing something new and not the same thing being played again but with different actors. Audiences like to be challenged, to understand the storyline and the direction in which the story is going. This makes the audience understand what is exactly going on and makes them extremely engaged to the screen. Arthouse films go about a different way in telling the story. They could have subtitles (if it were a foreign film) which would help the audience to understand what is happening but will challenge them in the sense of what is about to happen etc. An example of this, is the film known as 'Lore'. This film is about World War 2, however it is told very differently than compared to ordinary historical related films.

    2) Audiences struggle with arthouse film:

    Arthouse films tend to be foreign, however a few of them do tend to be in English as well. These films do tend to be a mainstream film from their country of origin, however it is classed as Arthouse as it is built on the foundations for artistic purposes rather than commercial (which is what some Blockbuster films distributors do). Audiences struggle to adapt their mindset from what they usually watch which is often mainstream films) to an entirely different film in general. This difference makes it extremely difficult for audiences to watch Arthouse films as they are so used to watching mainstream big blockbuster type films.

    Another struggle in which audiences have over Arthouse films is that they do not tend to follow the equilibrium structure that mainstream films do. This theory refers back to the media theorist known as Todorov who described the structure of films in a three way structure. Here is the example:

    • Equilibrium (the state of the story at the beginning is normal)
    • Disequilibrium (there is an even that occurs which changes the narrative negatively)
    • New equilibrium (order is restored and the disequilibrium is destroyed)
    This is an example of the three lane structure in which traditional blockbuster (and famously known films) take in its narrative structure. This is the way in which the film projects the narrative to the audience and builds anticipation. On the other hand is Arthouse cinema who portrays the narrative of (most of) their films in a different way. They tend to change the three lane structure of Todorovs theory and challenge it. Instead, the films displayed (and that are categorised as) Arthouse films would either start with a dis-equilibrium or would end with one. The problem that audience's would face is that they do not want to watch a film that will leave them disappointed that order wasn't restored in the films narrative. And it is this change in films narrative structure that puts off audiences from watching Arthouse films.


    3) Extent of audience. such as middle class and older audiences:

    Arthouse films are only for the middle and upper class to a large extent. One reason is because of the prices that the tickets offer. Arthouse cinema in general is different from the mainstream cinema chains. Arthouse is a chain of independent cinemas which put on films that are not targeted for a mainstream audience. It is this, the style and feel, of this unique and different cinema that makes the price so much more than compared to Vue or Odeon. The most common form of mainstream cinema chains (Vue and Odeon) put on films which carry a simple narrative in which is filled with famous faces to increase anticipation for the film. It is this 'common' style that does put some people off from watching a blockbuster again they believe they are seeing the same thing again but with different faces. Arthouse cinema is different. It has a new approach to films in general. It challenges the mainstream ideology of mainstream narrative and projects film that break that mainstream feel. The reason why the middle class and upper class are more likely to go and watch a film in an Arthouse cinema is because it breaks that mainstream feel that audiences are so used to. The lower and working class would not be able to afford to buy an Arthouse ticket due to its expense from mainstream cinema chains and would not care about the content they are watching. They just want to watch films for escapism rather than just the plot and narrative segments of it.

    Another reason why it is for the middle and upper class is due to the interior. The interior of an Arthouse cinema is completely different and unique from the mainstream cinema chains that everyone goes to. It is visually pleasing as it isn't just ordinary seats, there are beds as well as sofas as well as footstools to increase comfortability. The reason why middle and upper class would go to an Arthouse cinema is because it treats them with more respect. There is luxury around them and buy purchasing an expensive ticket, they are purchasing for the experience as well as the feel of an Arthouse cinema. It is the differentiation of visuals that make those with money spend more because it is good value for money as they are being more treated with experience.

    Finally, another reason why Arthouse cinema is for the upper and middle class is due to the type target market and marketing for this cinema. Arthouse cinema isn't there to attract everyone. It is there to attract certain amount of people. People who have money to spend, people who love to spend their time in a comfortable area. These characteristics separate the public into their potential audience. Arthouse cinema has presented its brand image as luxurious and prestige, by having beautiful lounges and making themselves stand out from  the mainstream cinema chains. Lower class wouldn't care much about the visuals as they would purchase the ticket to watch the film and that's (not taking the feel and experience in to consideration).

    4) A Field In England's possible target audience:

    I think that the possible target audience for A Field In England would be the upper and more older class (and aged) audience. This is because the theme of the film. The film is based/set in a far ages period in England (possibly the Edwardian period). This gives little hints at the possible audience in which this film is targeting.

    First of all is the historical background and setting. If the film is being in a period far back in time in England, it would make sense that those who are knowledgeable and are well educated would understand the context of this film as well as understand its historical background. This reveals that the film tends to attract educated people.

    This brings us on to the next point, upper class and older aged people. Generally, the upper class are those who have more money (due to their status as well as job title). This generally means that the uper class have well paid jobs thus meaning that they are well educated. Then we have the older aged audience. Since this film is set a long time ago, it is the older age demographic that would be interested in this type of film due to their heritage or even their love for history. Stereotypically, people refer to older people as lovers of black and white films as well as older aged films. Although stereotypes tend not to be true, this one seems to be true as the majority of monochromatic films are enjoyed and best viewed by the older age demographic. A Field In England is set in a monochromatic style which can attract this demographic as well as the upper class to be more likely to watch this type of film.